From: | Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com, mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage |
Date: | 2012-02-21 10:44:35 |
Message-ID: | CACMqXCLJWhq=2DnTa8iahvdVTYyc_-uts_jPJRva-YOiXLyVRA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
<horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> > - PQskipResult(conn, true) makes all consequent PQgetResult()'s
>> > to skip all the rows.
>
> Well, Is this right?
Yes, call getResult() until it returns NULL.
>> > If this is right, row processor should stay also in PGresult
>> > context. PQskipResult() replaces the row processor in PGconn when
>> > the second parameter is true, and in PGresult for false.
>>
>> No, let's keep row processor only under PGconn.
>
> Then, Should I add the stash for the row processor (and needless
> for param) to recall after in PGconn?
PQskipResult:
- store old callback and param in local vars
- set do-nothing row callback
- call PQgetresult() once, or until it returns NULL
- restore old callback
- return 1 if last result was non-NULL, 0 otherwise
--
marko
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2012-02-21 10:48:15 | Re: Access Error Details from PL/pgSQL |
Previous Message | Sandro Santilli | 2012-02-21 10:19:03 | Runtime SHAREDIR for testing CREATE EXTENSION |