| From: | Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Let's drop V2 protocol |
| Date: | 2012-02-24 14:40:26 |
| Message-ID: | CACMqXCKmCONWb4Qejto+YSg6d3rvcnA7EbQd_E73UodNK6u1qQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 7:52 AM, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> So could we like, uh, not do it and simply drop the V2 code?
>
> I think it's plausible that very old client libraries could connect to
> a modern server. But it's pretty unlikely to have a 9.2 app contact
> an ancient server IMO.
We can drop it from libpq but keep the server-side support,
the codebase is different.
--
marko
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2012-02-24 14:43:14 | Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) |
| Previous Message | Yeb Havinga | 2012-02-24 14:40:24 | Re: [v9.2] Add GUC sepgsql.client_label |