From: | Varadharajan Mukundan <srinathsmn(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Mel Llaguno <mllaguno(at)coverity(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Anyone have experience using PG on a NetApp All-Flash FAS8000? |
Date: | 2015-03-14 07:02:20 |
Message-ID: | CACKkDGH=D4DA-RH9=Rpghg_X_8y2ry7uyOYdDtk9yezf4Bm6uQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi Mel,
I don't have any experience in NetApp storage systems, but if
compression / deduplication is the only point for which you're
consider NetApp, then do consider FS like ZFS or btrfs which can do
deduplication as well as compression on normal disks. Here are few
reports of running Postgres on ZFS
(http://www.citusdata.com/blog/64-zfs-compression) and btrfs
(http://no0p.github.io/postgresql/2014/09/06/benchmarking-postgresql-btrfs-zlib.html)
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Mel Llaguno <mllaguno(at)coverity(dot)com> wrote:
> The reason I ask is that it seems to support deduplication/compression. I
> was wondering if this would have any performance implications of PG
> operations.
>
>
> Thanks, M.
>
>
> Mel Llaguno • Staff Engineer – Team Lead
> Office: +1.403.264.9717 x310
> www.coverity.com <http://www.coverity.com/> • Twitter: @coverity
> Coverity by Synopsys
--
Thanks,
M. Varadharajan
------------------------------------------------
"Experience is what you get when you didn't get what you wanted"
-By Prof. Randy Pausch in "The Last Lecture"
My Journal :- www.thinkasgeek.wordpress.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gavin Flower | 2015-03-14 21:06:22 | Re: Performance issues |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2015-03-14 00:12:26 | Re: Performance issues |