From: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 2024-02-08 release announcement draft |
Date: | 2024-02-08 12:34:56 |
Message-ID: | CACJufxGafAPL-ecJBHK5SSZ6SjLSzL8b7LimbZJoSAg=5ySGkA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 1:17 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> > On 2/6/24 3:19 AM, jian he wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 12:43 PM Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> >>> * In PL/pgSQL, support SQL commands that are `CREATE FUNCTION`/`CREATE
> >>> PROCEDURE` with SQL-standard bodies.
>
> >> https://git.postgresql.org/cgit/postgresql.git/commit/?id=57b440ec115f57ff6e6a3f0df26063822e3123d2
> >> says only for plpgsql routine or DO block.
>
> > I had some trouble wordsmithing this, but the commit title is pretty
> > clear to me so I opted for that.
>
> Your text seems fine to me. I'm confused about the objection here:
> exactly what uses of plpgsql aren't in a routine or DO block?
>
> regards, tom lane
I guess I was confused with cases like this
`
create function test1() returns int language plpgsql
begin atomic
select unique1 from tenk1 limit 1;
end ;
`
looking back, the original text seems fine.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2024-02-08 12:57:47 | Re: "ERROR: latch already owned" on gharial |
Previous Message | jian he | 2024-02-08 12:17:09 | Re: Catalog domain not-null constraints |