Re: meson and check-tests

From: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tristan Partin <tristan(at)partin(dot)io>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: meson and check-tests
Date: 2024-10-04 13:13:01
Message-ID: CACJufxG3DCqLDzNF88oDk-+LXHBN=yeJ4_=7XzYiqt0c_Q24zw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

v3, 0001 documentation:
We can at least write something on
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Meson about this feature.

TESTS='check check_btree' meson test amcheck/regress --verbose
works, but I feel like there is a discoverability issue .

TESTS='check check_btree' meson test amcheck/regress --list --verbose
shows:
postgresql:amcheck / amcheck/regress

For small tests, listing all the available tests would be great.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2024-10-04 13:16:23 SET ROLE and parameter status
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2024-10-04 13:11:44 Re: not null constraints, again