Re: Infinite Interval

From: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Joseph Koshakow <koshy44(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Infinite Interval
Date: 2022-12-31 05:09:10
Message-ID: CACJufxFbyVsdGzDEnoTKbfYa=rasCDa8NP5xb-MMd9o4=8V7Hw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 10:47 PM Joseph Koshakow <koshy44(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> I have another update, I cleaned up some of the error messages, fixed
> the horology tests, and ran pgindent.
>
> - Joe
>

Hi, there.

Since in float8 you can use '+inf', '+infinity', So should we also make
interval '+infinity' valid?
Also in timestamp. '+infinity'::timestamp is invalid, should we make it
valid.

In float8, select float8 'inf' / float8 'inf' return NaN. Now in your patch
select interval 'infinity' / float8 'infinity'; returns infinity.
I am not sure it's right. I found this related post (
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/181304/what-is-infinity-divided-by-infinity
).

I recommend David Deutsch's <<The Beginning of Infinity>>

Jian

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2022-12-31 05:36:02 Re: Is RecoveryConflictInterrupt() entirely safe in a signal handler?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-12-31 04:42:24 Re: postgres_fdw: using TABLESAMPLE to collect remote sample