Re: attndims, typndims still not enforced, but make the value within a sane threshold

From: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: attndims, typndims still not enforced, but make the value within a sane threshold
Date: 2024-09-18 14:35:46
Message-ID: CACJufxEqJyD0o6t9f1NLp2cgaUeyRzNv+PiDuKnrP1xekHFYyQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 10:10 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Can we error out at the stage "create table", "create domain"
> > time if the attndims or typndims is larger than MAXDIM (6) ?
>
> The last time this was discussed, I think the conclusion was
> we should remove attndims and typndims entirely on the grounds
> that they're useless. I certainly don't see a point in adding
> more logic that could give the misleading impression that they
> mean something.
>

https://commitfest.postgresql.org/43/
search "dim" or "pg_attribute", no relevant result,
i am assuming, nobody doing work to remove attndims and typndims entirely?
If so, I will try to make one.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Benoit Lobréau 2024-09-18 14:46:00 Re: Logging parallel worker draught
Previous Message Anton A. Melnikov 2024-09-18 14:35:26 Re: May be BUG. Periodic burst growth of the checkpoint_req counter on replica.