Re: Latches vs lwlock contention

From: Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: Latches vs lwlock contention
Date: 2024-09-10 16:53:02
Message-ID: CACG=ezYS6sKbWa=Py23jH8P-SXGbZ+z6T_rYaEwfjGfh_yLgrQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I looked at the patch set and found it quite useful.

The first 7 patches are just refactoring and may be committed separately if
needed.
There were minor problems: patch #5 don't want to apply clearly and the #8
is complained
about partitionLock is unused if we build without asserts. So, I add a
PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY
to solve the last issue.

Again, overall patch looks good and seems useful to me. Here is the rebased
v5 version based on Heikki's patch set above.

--
Best regards,
Maxim Orlov.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v5-0004-Move-TRACE-calls-into-WaitOnLock.patch application/octet-stream 2.5 KB
v5-0001-Remove-LOCK_PRINT-call-that-could-point-to-garbag.patch application/octet-stream 1.1 KB
v5-0003-Set-MyProc-heldLocks-in-ProcSleep.patch application/octet-stream 3.1 KB
v5-0005-Remove-redundant-lockAwaited-global-variable.patch application/octet-stream 5.3 KB
v5-0002-Fix-comment-in-LockReleaseAll-on-when-locallock-n.patch application/octet-stream 1.1 KB
v5-0007-Release-partition-lock-a-little-earlier.patch application/octet-stream 1.4 KB
v5-0006-Update-local-lock-table-in-ProcSleep-s-caller.patch application/octet-stream 2.1 KB
v5-0008-Split-ProcSleep-function-into-JoinWaitQueue-and-P.patch application/octet-stream 17.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2024-09-10 16:59:03 Re: Refactoring postmaster's code to cleanup after child exit
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2024-09-10 16:52:42 Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes