From: | milist ujang <ujang(dot)milist(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pglogical 2.3.2 on 9.4 --> 12.3 CONFLICT: remote DELETE (tuple not found). Resolution: skip. |
Date: | 2020-08-12 12:35:27 |
Message-ID: | CACG9ogxOs4B0P83rCP-2EFtuj1RipJP=_QCsJ1fQwq8cms=ycQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
replication identity correctly displayed on detail after resolution message:
LOG: CONFLICT: remote DELETE on relation public.a_XXXX replica identity
index a_XXX_pk (tuple not found). Resolution: skip.
DETAIL: remote tuple {created_by[int8]:(null)
created_date[timestamp]:(null) updated_by[int8]:(null)
updated_date[timestamp]:(null)
pk_col_1[varchar]:ZZZ100008 pk_col_2[bpchar]:12 pk_col_3[bpchar]:G <<
this is oldval
status_data[varchar]:(null)} in xact origin=2,timestamp=2020-08-12
08:06:33.956683+08,commit_lsn=0/CA6499D0
I am curious about bpchar in log DETAILS.
Is it the correct error message for the data type char?
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 10:50 AM milist ujang <ujang(dot)milist(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> Configured pglogical source is 9.4 target is 12.3
>
> a table has PK from multiple column (varchar(50),char(2),char(1)).
>
> initial syncronization is OK, but when at source there is delete , but got
> error at target...
>
> LOG: CONFLICT: remote DELETE on relation public.a_XXXX replica identity
> index a_XXX_pk (tuple not found). Resolution: skip.
>
> replica identity was set to default for the table so yes there is old
> image on those 3 columns:
>
> but why delete was error at target?
> collation exactly same on all GUC.
>
> any direction to print debug verbosity on why delete on target didnt find
> row and skipped?
>
>
>
> --
> regards
>
> ujang jaenudin | DBA Consultant (Freelancer)
> http://ora62.wordpress.com
> http://id.linkedin.com/pub/ujang-jaenudin/12/64/bab
>
--
regards
ujang jaenudin | DBA Consultant (Freelancer)
http://ora62.wordpress.com
http://id.linkedin.com/pub/ujang-jaenudin/12/64/bab
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shantanu Shekhar | 2020-08-12 12:46:06 | Postgres automatic minor version upgrade |
Previous Message | Paul Förster | 2020-08-12 08:11:01 | Re: How is PG replication typically used to create a High Availability (HA) config ? |