Re: Proposal: Limitations of palloc inside checkpointer

From: Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Ekaterina Sokolova <e(dot)sokolova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal: Limitations of palloc inside checkpointer
Date: 2025-02-28 16:54:12
Message-ID: CACG=ezaXQroNuSwhvymza=gqpxV93nTjRvpq-EoEgLWhGfMubw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I think I figured it out. Here is v4.

If the number of requests is less than 1 GB, the algorithm stays the same
as before. If we need to process more, we will do it incrementally with
slices of 1 GB.

Best regards,
Maxim Orlov.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v4-0001-Process-sync-requests-incrementally-in-AbsorbSync.patch application/octet-stream 3.7 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabrízio de Royes Mello 2025-02-28 16:54:13 Re: Space missing from EXPLAIN output
Previous Message Thom Brown 2025-02-28 16:37:20 Space missing from EXPLAIN output