Re: Proposal: Limitations of palloc inside checkpointer

From: Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Ekaterina Sokolova <e(dot)sokolova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal: Limitations of palloc inside checkpointer
Date: 2025-02-26 11:10:33
Message-ID: CACG=ezaP5j_HnSS4_bc51Fw=O4-Sdd=-tQTiodrdq8QRThshPw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 at 11:54, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:

>
> 4) Do compaction incrementally, instead of doing it for all requests at
> once.

Yeah, good idea! I completely forgot about that. Thanks!

--
Best regards,
Maxim Orlov.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker 2025-02-26 11:12:16 Re: pg_trgm comparison bug on cross-architecture replication due to different char implementation
Previous Message Bertrand Drouvot 2025-02-26 10:59:11 Re: per backend WAL statistics