On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 at 09:22, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> The problem may be actually trickier than that, no? Could there be
> other factors to take into account for their classification, like
> their sizes (typically, we'd want to process the biggest one first, I
> guess)?
Sorry for a late reply. Thanks for an explanation. This is sounds
reasonable to me.
Svetlana had addressed this in the patch v2.
--
Best regards,
Maxim Orlov.