Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check UNIQUE constraint in btree index.

From: Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Maxim Orlov <m(dot)orlov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check UNIQUE constraint in btree index.
Date: 2022-09-28 08:36:40
Message-ID: CACG=ezYk7up-BUL30SrGozURYWt97BK2f=XhUL6S+qU3F9qVzQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi!

I think, this patch was marked as "Waiting on Author", probably, by
mistake. Since recent changes were done without any significant code
changes and CF bot how happy again.

I'm going to move it to RfC, could I? If not, please tell why.

--
Best regards,
Maxim Orlov.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2022-09-28 08:40:13 Re: making relfilenodes 56 bits
Previous Message wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com 2022-09-28 08:35:33 RE: Data is copied twice when specifying both child and parent table in publication