Re: Postgres Synchronous replication

From: Ravi Krishna <sravikrishna3(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Keith <keith(at)keithf4(dot)com>
Cc: Scott Ribe <scott_ribe(at)elevated-dev(dot)com>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgres Synchronous replication
Date: 2015-05-21 21:00:22
Message-ID: CACER=P3BkVu3fadn6TsDBs1-4JGZeWDzDp8dcjJvW3kaf-Bxyg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

>
> >>
>> Every time the primary crashes...
>
>

> >
>> While I agree it's a limitation, in 14 years I've not seen PG crash once
>
>
What about machine crashing? With Intel/Linux based commodity hardware, we
go with the assumption that machines will fail and indeed they do. For our
DB2 and Oracle servers, it is a breeze to re-integrate the failed server.

Anyhow pg_rewind seem to solve that issue.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Ribe 2015-05-21 21:02:46 Re: Postgres Synchronous replication
Previous Message Keith 2015-05-21 20:44:35 Re: Postgres Synchronous replication