Re: PATCH: To fix the issue in Debugger module (pgAdmin4)

From: Neel Patel <neel(dot)patel(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Murtuza Zabuawala <murtuza(dot)zabuawala(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: To fix the issue in Debugger module (pgAdmin4)
Date: 2016-10-21 12:27:47
Message-ID: CACCA4P3QPMzmrktKDpvq-Oja30ryeJJcTdouXN+Pz7ci2tkvog@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

Hi,

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:

> Hi
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Neel Patel
> <neel(dot)patel(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> There are still issues I'm afraid:
> >>
> >> - When execution stops, we seem to keep polling for more results
> >> indefinitely.
> >
> > Do you mean after completion of first successful debugging ?
> > If yes, we are polling because user can start same function for debugging
> > again and we have to listen for the result set for that session.
>
> Yes (or the second). But shouldn't we stop polling until debugging is
> restarted?
>

I think yes, that can be done.

>
> >>
> >>
> >> - When executing for a second time, the messages tab isn't cleared,
> >> and new messages don't seem to be appended to it either. I would
> >> expect the tab to be cleared.
> >
> >
> > Ok. We will fix this issue.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Murtuza Zabuawala
> >> <murtuza(dot)zabuawala(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> >> > Hi Dave,
> >> >
> >> > PFA updated patch for the same.
> >> >
> >> > Issue:
> >> > We were not properly fetching result from server in case of direct
> >> > debugging
> >> > when we restart debugging of same object.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks to Neel for helping in this issue.
> >> >
> >> > Please review.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Regards,
> >> > Murtuza Zabuawala
> >> > EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> >> > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
> wrote:
> >> >> > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Murtuza Zabuawala
> >> >> > <murtuza(dot)zabuawala(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> >> >> >> Hi Dave,
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I faced the same issue when I initially tried that, but then as
> per
> >> >> >> Neel
> >> >> >> suggestion I changed SELECT pg_sleep() to PERFORM pg_sleep() in
> >> >> >> function.
> >> >> >> You will face the same in pgAdmin3 if you use select pg_sleep() in
> >> >> >> your
> >> >> >> function the debug call never returns from DB server.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > In which case, doesn't that imply the debugger is missing critical
> >> >> > debug info? If I run the query in the query tool, I get:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > ====
> >> >> > INFO: EMPNO ENAME
> >> >> > INFO: ----- -------
> >> >> > ERROR: query has no destination for result data
> >> >> > HINT: If you want to discard the results of a SELECT, use PERFORM
> >> >> > instead.
> >> >> > CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function list_emp() line 11 at SQL statement
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Query returned successfully in 2 secs.
> >> >> > ====
> >> >> >
> >> >> > It seems to me that the debugger should be able to give the same
> >> >> > error.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Regardless of that, I'll test with PERFORM.
> >> >>
> >> >> Which I just did - and whilst it seemed to be fine when stepping
> >> >> through, after a few iterations I hit the continue button, at which
> >> >> point it froze again on "PERFORM pg_sleep(2)", didn't print any more
> >> >> of the 14 names in the emp table, and didn't return :-(
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Dave Page
> >> >> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> >> >> Twitter: @pgsnake
> >> >>
> >> >> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> >> >> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Dave Page
> >> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> >> Twitter: @pgsnake
> >>
> >> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> >> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> >> To make changes to your subscription:
> >> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Surinder Kumar 2016-10-21 13:18:11 [pgAdmin4][Patch]: RM1867 - User can not drop package body under properties section
Previous Message Dave Page 2016-10-21 11:50:01 Re: [pgAdmin4][Patch]: RM 1574 - sql is not displayed in SQL pane for security label in both PG and EPAS/PPAS server