Re: PATCH: To fix the issue in Debugger module (pgAdmin4)

From: Neel Patel <neel(dot)patel(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Murtuza Zabuawala <murtuza(dot)zabuawala(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: To fix the issue in Debugger module (pgAdmin4)
Date: 2016-10-21 11:32:37
Message-ID: CACCA4P2BOCiNDisEfTi_aSTSugUFTjZea-YZ-AWZNSBN8Lj63w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

Hi,

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:

> Hi
>
> There are still issues I'm afraid:
>
> - When execution stops, we seem to keep polling for more results
> indefinitely.
>
Do you mean after completion of first successful debugging ?
If yes, we are polling because user can start same function for debugging
again and we have to listen for the result set for that session.

>
> - When executing for a second time, the messages tab isn't cleared,
> and new messages don't seem to be appended to it either. I would
> expect the tab to be cleared.
>

Ok. We will fix this issue.

>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Murtuza Zabuawala
> <murtuza(dot)zabuawala(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> > Hi Dave,
> >
> > PFA updated patch for the same.
> >
> > Issue:
> > We were not properly fetching result from server in case of direct
> debugging
> > when we restart debugging of same object.
> >
> > Thanks to Neel for helping in this issue.
> >
> > Please review.
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Murtuza Zabuawala
> > EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Murtuza Zabuawala
> >> > <murtuza(dot)zabuawala(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> >> >> Hi Dave,
> >> >>
> >> >> I faced the same issue when I initially tried that, but then as per
> >> >> Neel
> >> >> suggestion I changed SELECT pg_sleep() to PERFORM pg_sleep() in
> >> >> function.
> >> >> You will face the same in pgAdmin3 if you use select pg_sleep() in
> your
> >> >> function the debug call never returns from DB server.
> >> >
> >> > In which case, doesn't that imply the debugger is missing critical
> >> > debug info? If I run the query in the query tool, I get:
> >> >
> >> > ====
> >> > INFO: EMPNO ENAME
> >> > INFO: ----- -------
> >> > ERROR: query has no destination for result data
> >> > HINT: If you want to discard the results of a SELECT, use PERFORM
> >> > instead.
> >> > CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function list_emp() line 11 at SQL statement
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Query returned successfully in 2 secs.
> >> > ====
> >> >
> >> > It seems to me that the debugger should be able to give the same
> error.
> >> >
> >> > Regardless of that, I'll test with PERFORM.
> >>
> >> Which I just did - and whilst it seemed to be fine when stepping
> >> through, after a few iterations I hit the continue button, at which
> >> point it froze again on "PERFORM pg_sleep(2)", didn't print any more
> >> of the 14 names in the emp table, and didn't return :-(
> >>
> >> --
> >> Dave Page
> >> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> >> Twitter: @pgsnake
> >>
> >> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> >> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2016-10-21 11:33:40 Re: PATCH: To fix the issue in Debugger module (pgAdmin4)
Previous Message Dave Page 2016-10-21 11:24:35 Re: Language node patch