Re: huge price database question..

From: Jim Green <student(dot)northwestern(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: huge price database question..
Date: 2012-03-21 02:30:16
Message-ID: CACAe89ybCyk06ELRB2qR=N+fFzQBOPvg=7r18D5uVb=mbMywQQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 20 March 2012 22:22, John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> wrote:
> your 7000 tables all contain the exact same information, with the only
> difference being the stock ticker symbol, right?    then really, the single
> table, perhaps partitioned by month or whatever, is the right way to go.
>  Any schema that makes you have to build SQL statements from strings for
> each query is designed wrong.

each table contains 1 minute price data for that symbol, so each table
has the same schema, open, high,low,close and volume etc, but not the
same data..

Thanks.

>
>
>
> --
> john r pierce                            N 37, W 122
> santa cruz ca                         mid-left coast
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Green 2012-03-21 02:35:34 Re: huge price database question..
Previous Message Jim Green 2012-03-21 02:26:53 Re: huge price database question..