Re: When to use PARTITION BY HASH?

From: Oleksandr Shulgin <oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: When to use PARTITION BY HASH?
Date: 2020-06-03 07:38:49
Message-ID: CACACo5TQQ7bqB57N2y6cZHVeyP0T8LiTpqSUhc6=M6DuBuDXCw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-performance

On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 7:47 PM Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:

>
> Please don't cross post to multiple lists without any particular reason
> for doing so- pick whichever list makes sense and post to that.
>

Sorry for the trouble, I should've checked it more carefully.
When posting I did think it may be relevant to the performance list as well.

At the same time, wouldn't it make sense to document this policy explicitly?
/me resists the urge of cross-posting to pgsql-www ;)

Cheers,
--
Alex

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleksandr Shulgin 2020-06-03 07:45:48 Re: When to use PARTITION BY HASH?
Previous Message Andrus 2020-06-03 07:07:14 canceling statement due to conflict with recovery after pg_basebackup

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleksandr Shulgin 2020-06-03 07:45:48 Re: When to use PARTITION BY HASH?
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2020-06-02 17:47:12 Re: When to use PARTITION BY HASH?