From: | Oleksandr Shulgin <oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: When to use PARTITION BY HASH? |
Date: | 2020-06-03 07:38:49 |
Message-ID: | CACACo5TQQ7bqB57N2y6cZHVeyP0T8LiTpqSUhc6=M6DuBuDXCw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 7:47 PM Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
>
> Please don't cross post to multiple lists without any particular reason
> for doing so- pick whichever list makes sense and post to that.
>
Sorry for the trouble, I should've checked it more carefully.
When posting I did think it may be relevant to the performance list as well.
At the same time, wouldn't it make sense to document this policy explicitly?
/me resists the urge of cross-posting to pgsql-www ;)
Cheers,
--
Alex
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oleksandr Shulgin | 2020-06-03 07:45:48 | Re: When to use PARTITION BY HASH? |
Previous Message | Andrus | 2020-06-03 07:07:14 | canceling statement due to conflict with recovery after pg_basebackup |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oleksandr Shulgin | 2020-06-03 07:45:48 | Re: When to use PARTITION BY HASH? |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2020-06-02 17:47:12 | Re: When to use PARTITION BY HASH? |