From: | Oleksandr Shulgin <oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? |
Date: | 2020-05-05 11:39:46 |
Message-ID: | CACACo5TJ_X1cUo1zDnyGNusOkZLfxx62UVtS8rHj99K1hKXGaA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 11:22 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I've now completed updating chapter 9 for the new layout,
> and the results are visible at
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/functions.html
> There is more to do --- for instance, various contrib modules
> have function/operator tables that should be synced with this
> design. But this seemed like a good place to pause and reflect.
>
Would it be premature to complain about the not-that-great look of Table
9.1 now?
Compare the two attached images: the screenshot from
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/functions-comparison.html
vs the GIMP-assisted pipe dream of mine to align it to the right edge of
the table cell.
I don't have the faintest idea how to achieve that using SGML at the
moment, but it just looks so much nicer to me. ;-)
Regards,
--
Alex
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
image/png | 49.6 KB | |
image/png | 48.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2020-05-05 12:11:32 | Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2020-05-05 11:34:24 | Re: PG compilation error with Visual Studio 2015/2017/2019 |