| From: | "Shulgin, Oleksandr" <oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | konstantin knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Logical replication and multimaster |
| Date: | 2015-12-03 08:34:14 |
| Message-ID: | CACACo5SvaND8+YrJ2NSLa4iRm_Q7YTcwsVaEX=9RDSee5zonLw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 3 December 2015 at 14:54, konstantin knizhnik <
> k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
>
>>
>> Are there some principle problems with it? In BDR it was handled in
>> alternative way, using executor callback. It will be much easier if DDL can
>> be replicated in the same way as normal SQL statements.
>>
>
> It can't. I wish it could.
>
That reminds me of that DDL deparsing patch I was trying to revive a while
ago. Strangely, I cannot find it in any of the commit fests. Will add it.
--
Alex
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | amul sul | 2015-12-03 08:52:43 | Passing initially_valid values instead of !skip_validation to StoreRelCheck() in AddRelationNewConstraints() |
| Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2015-12-03 07:34:59 | Re: Logical replication and multimaster |