Re: Enhancement Request

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 3:47 AM, David G. Johnston <
david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Melvin Davidson <melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Enhancement or feature requests should probably go to *Custormer
>> Feedback <https://postgresql.uservoice.com/forums/21853-general>*
>> https://postgresql.uservoice.com/forums/21853-general
>>
>
> ​I'm on the PostgreSQL home page: what series of links would lead to "
> uservoice.com" so that I can submit my feature request?
>
> If that site is going to be recommended over posting to pgsql-general it
> should feature prominently on the main website.
>
> ​I've seen or heard nothing that suggests anywhere except pgsql-general,
> this list, is the correct place to submit such requests. I do think we are
> lacking sufficient communication in this area but would rather see that
> corrected and formalized before we go pointing people to third-party sites.
>

It is interesting that this channel was opened at least in the middle 2009
or before (judging by the feature/comments timestamps). It would be nice
if uservoice provided any hint or contact for the owner of the channel,
because right now it appears to be a total mystery.

I'm not sure if the owner is subscribed to -general, I wouldn't be
surprised if not. Otherwise, please speak up. :-)

I think that such user communication channel can be useful if maintained
properly, and if the rest of the community would be aware of its
existence. What I dislike right now, is that it pretends to be official
channel without any disclaimer or references to the actual official
communication channels (which are the mailing lists and IRC, AFAIK).

Regards,
--
Alex