| From: | "Shulgin, Oleksandr" <oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Adding since-version tags to the docs? |
| Date: | 2015-08-31 13:52:39 |
| Message-ID: | CACACo5Ra-RHK_sRCZG1GP=TX5ugZ0mPbeq-nNmn56NXsEoWHBw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2015-08-31 13:06:04 +0200, Shulgin, Oleksandr wrote:
> > I often find it pity that our docs are missing any information on since
> > when a certain GUC setting, SQL-level command or function was introduced.
>
> Same here. Not sure how to display it without getting disturbing the
> 'flow' of the docs too much though.
>
> > It would be nice if we could make a script that would parse the sgml
> files
> > and for every symbol it finds it would add a tag like "Since version
> 9.x".
> > Such a script could start by checking out REL9_0_STABLE and looking
> through
> > all symbols it can find, tagging them "Since 9.0". Then it could commit
> > the result, check out the next version branch and apply said commit (some
> > manual effort to merge it might be required), and repeat the process,
> > assuming all newly found symbols must be introduced in this new version.
>
> I doubt that this can easily be done automatedly. But it'd be cool if
> so.
>
I'll try to see if that's feasible. :-)
Perhaps we could start doing it going forward?
>
I would be all for that.
--
Alex
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | YUriy Zhuravlev | 2015-08-31 13:57:04 | Re: WIP: About CMake v2 |
| Previous Message | Shulgin, Oleksandr | 2015-08-31 13:51:43 | Re: Adding since-version tags to the docs? |