| From: | "Shulgin, Oleksandr" <oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Moving a large DB (> 500GB) to another DB with different locale |
| Date: | 2016-01-15 15:04:00 |
| Message-ID: | CACACo5QH=ZMvkiNo63K=Fjd4kqYZJewJj_CdjomMicZmR-sgyA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com>
wrote:
> På fredag 15. januar 2016 kl. 14:33:24, skrev Shulgin, Oleksandr <
> oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de>:
>
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I see that wal_level = 'logical', and that is a problem for us as we
>> already use wal_level = 'hot_standby' on this installation as it replicates
>> to another server.
>>
>> Is it possible to use pglogical together with hot_standby
>> streaming-replication?
>>
>
> Well, the wal_level change is just a matter of database restart: you got
> to do that once in a while anyway, e.g. for minor version updates. I would
> expect you only need this wal_level on the walsender side, thus for
> pglogical_output, the logical decoding plugin.
>
>
> My point is that we cannot not have streaming-replication, so we need to
> keep wal_level = 'hot_standby' AFAIU. Is there a way to do both
> streaming-replication *and* pglogical for just replicating one of may
> databases in the same cluster?
>
But logical is "greater than" hot_standby, so you can still have streaming
replication with wal_level = logical.
--
Alex
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Joseph Krogh | 2016-01-15 15:10:24 | Re: Moving a large DB (> 500GB) to another DB with different locale |
| Previous Message | Andreas Joseph Krogh | 2016-01-15 14:41:05 | Re: Moving a large DB (> 500GB) to another DB with different locale |