Re: SET LOCAL ROLE NO RESET -- sandbox transactions

These seem like much better ideas than mine. :-) Thanks.

Did anything ever come of these ideas? Do you have a sense of the level of
community support around these ideas?

Thanks,
Eric

On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 11:23 AM Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>
wrote:

> On 3/27/19 2:40 AM, Eric Hanson wrote:
>
> > What would be the implications of adding a NO RESET clause to SET LOCAL
> > ROLE?
>
> There's a part of this that seems to be a special case of the
> GUC-protected-by-cookie idea discussed a bit in [1] and [2]
> (which is still an idea that I like).
>
> Regards,
> -Chap
>
> [1]
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/59127E4E.8090705%40anastigmatix.net
>
> [2]
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BTgmoYOz%2BZmOteahrduJCc8RT8GEgC6PNXLwRzJPObmHGaurg%40mail.gmail.com
>