Re: Logical replication troubleshooting

From: Siraj G <tosiraj(dot)g(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Logical replication troubleshooting
Date: 2024-06-24 09:28:14
Message-ID: CAC5iy61YoGUb844nwVZXh6-5pCEdXjPUCDvW379shTU5RoBhqw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Hello Admins!

I am getting this error again & again when trying to create a replication
for 22M records table.

INFO 2024-06-24T07:21:39.348016Z 2024-06-24 12:51:39.347 IST [400674]:
[1-1] db=,user= LOG: logical replication table synchronization worker for
subscription "sub_room_inventory", table "room_inventory" has started

ERROR 2024-06-24T09:01:11.559646Z 2024-06-24 14:31:11.559 IST [400674]:
[2-1] db=,user= ERROR: could not receive data from WAL stream: server
closed the connection unexpectedly This probably means the server
terminated abnormally before or while processing the request.

INFO 2024-06-24T09:01:11.561358Z 2024-06-24 14:31:11.561 IST [7]: [106-1]
db=,user= LOG: worker process: logical replication worker for subscription
95898332 sync 69720 (PID 400674) exited with exit code 1

On the target, i have these values set:

wal_sender_timeout=15min
wal_receiver_timeout=1hr

Please advice.

Regards
Siraj

On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 1:40 PM Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
wrote:

> On Mon, 2024-06-24 at 08:20 +0530, Siraj G wrote:
> > We are trying to migrate a on-premise PgSQL (v10) to GCP Cloud
> SQL's PgSQL (v10) via PubSub replication.
> > There are few archive tables with non-primary key are having issues in
> the replication.
>
> That's not surprising. You should create primary keys, if necessary only
> for the replication.
>
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Naveed Iftikhar 2024-06-24 14:47:51 Re: Monitoring Script for Postgres
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2024-06-24 08:13:37 Re: Segmentation Fault Issue in PostgreSQL 13.4