Re: proposal: rounding up time value less than its unit.

From: Tomonari Katsumata <t(dot)katsumata1122(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David G Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal: rounding up time value less than its unit.
Date: 2014-09-23 05:56:59
Message-ID: CAC55fYf_YPDTkMwr1nVx8ot_kQ=8fnsAH8wxVTWT-k7ey8B1OQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Stephen,

As you said, I'm not good at English, so I'm glad you handle this thread.
I'll wait for the good changing.

Thank you very very much!

regards,
------------------
Tomonari Katsumata

2014-09-23 14:23 GMT+09:00 Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>:

> * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> > Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> > > To clarify- we'll simply swap from (essentially) floor() to ceil() for
> > > handling all GUC_with_unit to internal_unit conversions, document that,
> > > and note it in the release notes as a possible behavior change and move
> > > on.
> >
> > Worksforme.
>
> Great, thanks. I'll wait a couple days to see if anyone else wants to
> voice a concern.
>
> Tomonari, don't worry about updating the patch (unless you really want
> to) as I suspect I'll be changing around the wording anyway. No
> offense, please, but I suspect English isn't your first language and
> it'll be simpler for me if I just handle it. Thanks a lot for the bug
> report and discussion and I'll be sure to credit you for it in the
> commit.
>
> Thanks again!
>
> Stephen
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2014-09-23 06:15:36 Re: RLS feature has been committed
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2014-09-23 05:53:55 Re: Assertion failure in syncrep.c