From: | king tomo <t(dot)katsumata1122(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #18224: message bug in libpqwalreceiver.c. |
Date: | 2023-12-05 11:50:00 |
Message-ID: | CAC55fYeNq7v3Rq+3dqKKsoWktSu8=WEXZOKLi9F_mmrX0o6T4g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Hello
Thank you for researching the past and for discussing it.
There is no problem with the modification policy suggested by Daniel.
Thank you for your continued support.
Best regards,
----
Tomonari Katsumata
2023年12月4日(月) 23:18 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
> > How about fixing the error message in the backbranches, with a comment
> why we
> > expect 3 and not 4 fields, and requiring 4 thus restricting to 9.4+ in
> HEAD?
>
> OK by me.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2023-12-05 13:44:20 | Re: BUG #18224: message bug in libpqwalreceiver.c. |
Previous Message | 费长红 | 2023-12-05 11:47:27 | Re: BUG #18213: Standby's repeatable read isolation level transaction encountered a "nonrepeatable read" problem |