From: | Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep(dot)dot(dot)nop(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Pg Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #6315: FETCH NEXT :next ROWS ONLY fails |
Date: | 2011-12-01 22:04:14 |
Message-ID: | CAC1BbcTHHKAS+Cp80OZz15pg8z4G0b7tThLGqjazLiwOSgYgwA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On 1 December 2011 22:50, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of jue dic 01 18:32:58 -0300 2011:
>> Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
>> > 2011-12-01 20:09 keltezéssel, rep(dot)dot(dot)nop(at)gmail(dot)com írta:
>> >> Binding for "OFFSET :offset" works fine but binding for a "FETCH NEXT :next
>> >> ROWS ONLY" raises:
>> >> syntax error at or near "$2"
>> >> SELECT * FROM foo OFFSET $1 ROWS FETCH NEXT $2 ROWS ONLY
>>
>> > This is not a supported syntax. Consider using
>> > SELECT * FROM foo OFFSET $1 LIMIT $2
>> > instead.
I think it's SQL2008 and is the "new" way of stating OFFSET $1 LIMIT
$2 (see docs).
>>
>> Well, actually it is supported, but you missed the fine print where it
>> says that you have to add parentheses if the offset or count isn't a
>> simple integer constant. I'll apply a patch to make that a bit more
>> obvious.
>
> Hmm, it works with parens only in the "fetch next" clause, they don't
> seem necessary in the limit. FWIW.
Exactly. That's why I find the need to quote the latter a bit counter
intuitive :)
cheers,
>
> alvherre=# prepare foo(int, int) as select * from generate_series(1, 200) offset $1 fetch next ($2) rows only;
> PREPARE
> alvherre=# execute foo(2+3, 1+2);
> generate_series
> -----------------
> 6
> 7
> 8
> (3 filas)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-12-01 22:06:04 | Re: BUG #6315: FETCH NEXT :next ROWS ONLY fails |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-12-01 21:50:38 | Re: BUG #6315: FETCH NEXT :next ROWS ONLY fails |