Re: Confusing behavior of psql's \e

From: Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo(dot)santamaria(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Jacob Champion <pchampion(at)vmware(dot)com>, "chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net" <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Confusing behavior of psql's \e
Date: 2021-03-10 10:16:18
Message-ID: CAC+AXB2kaNoZNUtUeNm6ocxKGQVJwxCmzcj3JhYRb-i2t2JtFQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 6:14 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

>
> PS: I seem to recall that some Microsoft filesystems have 2-second
> resolution on file mod times, so maybe it needs to be "time(NULL) - 2"?
>

You are thinking about FAT:

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/fileapi/nf-fileapi-getfiletime#remarks

Regards,

Juan José Santamaría Flecha

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2021-03-10 10:18:47 Re: [PATCH] Provide more information to filter_prepare
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2021-03-10 09:18:19 Re: Parallel INSERT (INTO ... SELECT ...)