Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench

From: Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo(dot)santamaria(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench
Date: 2020-03-04 09:22:26
Message-ID: CAC+AXB1UQOCLLTHqJMXGyHnJeot1=5uA9OqxQcRtGnX5FPJQ3w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 8:54 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:

>
> Attached is a patch to fix this issue. Please let me know if there
> are comments and/or objections.
>

I think there are a couple tools missing: pg_archivecleanup, pg_ctl,
pg_test_fsync and pg_upgrade. pg_regress also, but there is nothing to do
in the documentation with it.

Regards,

Juan José Santamaría Flecha

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2020-03-04 09:29:33 Re: PG14 target version?
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2020-03-04 09:14:37 Re: PG14 target version?