From: | Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo(dot)santamaria(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | williamedwinallen(at)live(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #15858: could not stat file - over 4GB |
Date: | 2019-06-19 16:07:14 |
Message-ID: | CAC+AXB0j9pN4z5XxMbn6+kcE_QM+CErjfYp-vVz2rU4suU7u=g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 3:26 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> Windows is known for having limitations in its former implementations
> of stat(), and the various _stat structures they use make actually
> that much harder from a compatibility point of view:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1803D792815FC24D871C00D17AE95905CF5099@g01jpexmbkw24
>
Going through this discussion it is not clear to me if there was a
consensus about the shape of an acceptable patch. Would something like
the attached be suitable?
Regards,
Juan José Santamaría Flecha
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-support-for-large-files-on-Win32.patch | application/octet-stream | 2.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Gierth | 2019-06-19 17:06:26 | Re: BUG #15855: Using 'nextval' inside INSERT RULE in case of bulk data insertion. |
Previous Message | Albrecht Scheidig | 2019-06-19 15:47:59 | XSS Bug in Query View |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker | 2019-06-19 17:04:27 | Re: Remove one last occurrence of "replication slave" in comments |
Previous Message | Thom Brown | 2019-06-19 16:06:51 | Re: SQL/JSON path issues/questions |