From: | John Scalia <jayknowsunix(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Autovacuum behavior |
Date: | 2015-07-30 18:49:46 |
Message-ID: | CABzCKRDtMfmgKFoMeTFDRGif+siQK9bXM4791ii8ZBJfORSFNA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Hi all,
The autovacuum settings for a 9.4.2 database are shown below, I'm not
absolutely certain if I missed anything:
autovacuum = on
log_autovacuum_min_duration = 100
autovacuum_max_workers = 15
autovacuum_naptime = 10min
#autovacuum_vacuum_threshold = 50
autovacuum_analyze_threshold = 80
autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor = 0.1
autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor = 0.2
autovacuum_freeze_max_age = 100000000
autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay = 20ms
autovacuum_vacuum_cost_limit = -1
vacuum_freeze_min_age = 5000000
vacuum_freeze_table_age = 2500000
But, when I examine pg_stat_all_tables, I'm seeing a lot of tables where
n_dead_tup is still a lot greater than n_live_tup. Mind you, these are all
fairly small tables. I'm also seeing that the last_autovacuum ran about
11:22 AM CDT this morning.I would think the tables where there were no live
tuples and a bunch of dead_tuples would have been vacuumed after 11:22 AM
to clear the dead ones. Am I missing something?
--
Jay
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-07-30 18:59:39 | Re: Autovacuum behavior |
Previous Message | John Scalia | 2015-07-30 14:19:59 | Re: [ADMIN] How Many PG_Locks are considered too many |