From: | Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Removing savepointLevel from TransactionState |
Date: | 2011-09-29 05:22:46 |
Message-ID: | CABwTF4Xd56qmQGoZGpY1UfvoxKSVKjMBEA=kZE_UUpuS9paw8A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 1:11 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I noticed that the savepointLevel member of TransactionStateData struct
> is
> > initialized to 0 from TopTransactionStateData, and never incremented or
> > decremented afterwards.
>
> > Since this is a file-local struct I think we can simply get rid of all
> > usages of this without any risk.
>
> ISTM you have detected a bug, not just dead code that should be removed.
> Surely those tests that throw error on savepointLevel change were
> meant to do something important?
>
That's surprising for dead-code removal!
Not sure which failures you're pointing to. `make check` before and after
the patch on master says 'All 126 tests passed.'
Let me know about the failures, and I'll see if I can find the root cause.
Regards,
--
Gurjeet Singh
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2011-09-29 05:44:19 | Re: Removing savepointLevel from TransactionState |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-09-29 05:11:52 | Re: Removing savepointLevel from TransactionState |