From: | Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PGSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Why some GUC parameter names are not lowercased |
Date: | 2012-10-30 17:49:29 |
Message-ID: | CABwTF4VDZ6d_41y59BRYB-UkVcQsFLgk7EC2W3BNEtXPbJ2WYA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Is there a reason why Postgres chose to not use all lowercase characters
> > for these parameters' names.
> > DateStyle
> > IntervalStyle
> > TimeZone
>
> It's historical, for sure. I think we've discussed changing them and
> decided it would be more likely to break things than improve matters.
>
> In particular, modern style would probably be more like "date_style"
> etc, but we definitely could not insert underscores without breaking
> applications all over the place. So the best we could do is just
> smash to lowercase, eg "datestyle", which isn't really a readability
> improvement. And there would still be some risk of breaking
> applications that are expecting these names to print a particular way.
>
Can we develop aliases to these parameters, that adhere to the standard.
Next release we can mark the old ones as deprecated and a few releases down
the line completely remove the non-stsandard names and rest easy.
Would be happy to contribute such a patch. I think it'd be trivial.
--
Gurjeet Singh
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-10-30 18:23:59 | Re: Why some GUC parameter names are not lowercased |
Previous Message | Seref Arikan | 2012-10-30 16:14:23 | Re: Select Query Implementation:Details needed |