On May 29, 2014 12:12 AM, "Amit Kapila" <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I agree with you that there are only few corner cases where evicting
> shared buffers by this utility would harm, but was wondering if we could
> even save those, say if it would only use available free buffers. I think
> currently there is no such interface and inventing a new interface for
this
> case doesn't seem to reasonable unless we see any other use case of
> such a interface.
+1