From: | Blake McBride <blake(at)arahant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Chuck Davis <cjgunzel(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Packaging pgAdmin 4 |
Date: | 2021-11-27 20:25:40 |
Message-ID: | CABwHSOuJanuMY23SkZndVCuVnBuw-0JpRm7M8yVSTO7DDPe_9Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
True but they're usually out-of-date.
On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 2:09 PM Chuck Davis <cjgunzel(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Have you checked your distro repositories? The distro I use ships pgAdmin
> together with the latest and previous versions of postgresql.
>
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 10:52 AM Blake McBride <blake1024(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I've had ongoing difficulties installing pgAdmin 4. These difficulties
>> have to do with the way pgAdmin is packaged and distributed.
>>
>> For example, I use LinuxMint and Manjaro. The pgAdmin distributions
>> support neither. Although Mint is a derivative of Ubuntu, lsb_release -cs
>> returns a value not usable by pgAdmin's distribution system. I had to
>> tweak internal files to get it to work.
>>
>> I'd like to suggest using snap, flatpack, or AppImage. Using one of
>> these, pgAdmin would be trivial to install on nearly any distro and on
>> nearly any version of those distros. Secondly, you'd have to maintain far
>> fewer builds.
>>
>> The only negative to using one of these is that the installations would
>> be a bit larger. This is a very small penalty to get the portable and
>> convenience these package managers provide.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Blake McBride
>>
>>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shaozhong SHI | 2021-11-28 00:27:34 | Match 2 words and more |
Previous Message | Chuck Davis | 2021-11-27 20:08:44 | Re: Packaging pgAdmin 4 |