Re: *Proper* solution for 1..* relationship?

From: Richard Broersma <richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Wolfgang Keller <feliphil(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL List - Novice <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: *Proper* solution for 1..* relationship?
Date: 2013-05-02 15:41:06
Message-ID: CABvLTWGT9u9+ZN3VWiOLc7q1yqe2TaAvjZgryQ1aaeLX-k6AxQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Wolfgang Keller <feliphil(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:

> P.S.: I would have expected people with such an obscene attitude ("why
> care for data correctness") on a list for Access or similar crapware,
> but not on a list for PostgreSQL.

This is an inherent issue of the SQL Language. Perhaps TutorialD engines
will better satisfy your data modeling needs.

In response to

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Johnston 2013-05-02 15:53:35 Re: *Proper* solution for 1..* relationship?
Previous Message Wolfgang Keller 2013-05-02 15:26:33 Re: *Proper* solution for 1..* relationship?