From: | Richard Broersma <richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Nice Quote from Celko |
Date: | 2012-09-23 23:09:05 |
Message-ID: | CABvLTWGSf47PssV1FzG8Wq+tu14XBUEFHzJNmXDTz9wDfiUTUA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz
> wrote:
>
> http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Stairway+Series/89991/
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Richard Broersma Jr.
>>
>
> Can you quote it more fully?
>
Here is the excerpt that the quote comes from:
"Bottom Line
Porting applications to SQL Server is not the usual direction. Developers
are more likely to port SQL Server to Postgres because it is open source,
supports more ANSI features, runs on more platforms, uses a different ACID
model and has a great optimizer.
If you live in a Microsoft world and need to move Postgres code to SQL
Server, don’t expect the port to be easy. You might luck up, but that’s not
the way the smart money bets. The pure SQL part will not hard if the
original Postgres is clean and simple; you will have to write the extra
ANSI features with complicated T-SQL. The hard part is that Postgres
assumes a non-Microsoft environment and a different concurrency model."
--
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Bernier | 2012-09-24 15:31:48 | Re: Nice Quote from Celko |
Previous Message | Gabriele Bartolini | 2012-09-23 12:19:30 | Re: French Prime Minister loves PostgreSQL |