| From: | Justin Dearing <zippy1981(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Odd behavior with domains |
| Date: | 2016-06-24 03:09:48 |
| Message-ID: | CABsCM1NEm3twiO77q7XExDUX-Tdc5ob1pRMGvko1z6y+muJ8sQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I was the one that reported that on twitter. I have a more detailed message
on the general list that I sent before subscribing and probably needs to be
moderated (or if it went to /dev/null let me know).
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:01 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > So this came across my twitter feed:
> > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClqIJtmXEAA5IGt.png
>
> public.text can exist in parallel with pg_catalog.text.
>
> It just doesn't seem right to me to be able to do:
CREATE DOMAIN int AS varchar(50);
Justin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-06-24 03:15:01 | Re: tuplesort.c's copytup_index() is dead code |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-06-24 03:05:51 | Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready) |
