From: | mahendrakar s <mahendrakarforpg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-novice <pgsql-novice(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net |
Subject: | Re: using libjansson in postgres extension |
Date: | 2023-02-24 01:59:23 |
Message-ID: | CABkiuWpS0d24E4rZV9WhWuWM6BBgi3P3pti5seuAgKOkhVJ7TA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
+andrew.
Thoughts?
On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 19:08, mahendrakar s <mahendrakarforpg(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> Hello Hackers,
>
> I'm developing an extension where in it indirectly references (libjansson)
> and libjansson has a symbol json_object
> <https://github.com/akheron/jansson/blob/master/src/load.c#:~:text=json_t%20*object%20%3D%20json_object()%3B>which
> conflicts with postgres symbol 'json_object
> <https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/master/src/backend/utils/adt/json.c#:~:text=json_object(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)>
> '.
>
> I see below:
> PostgreSQL: Documentation: 11: 38.10. C-Language Functions
> <https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/xfunc-c.html#id-1.8.3.13.8>
> "Symbol names defined within object files must not conflict with each
> other or with symbols defined in the PostgreSQL server executable. You will
> have to rename your functions or variables if you get error messages to
> this effect."
>
> But this requires to maintain libjansson with customizations(have a
> different symbol) to meet the needs.
>
> Do you have any suggestions to use the libjansson 'as it is' without using
> the different symbol.
>
> Thanks,
> Mahendrakar.
>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gurjeet Singh | 2023-02-24 07:30:40 | Re: using libjansson in postgres extension |
Previous Message | mahendrakar s | 2023-02-23 13:38:50 | using libjansson in postgres extension |