| From: | ẞ(dot) Shafi <shafi1212212(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rajesh Kumar <rajeshkumar(dot)dba09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres storage migration |
| Date: | 2023-12-08 15:26:24 |
| Message-ID: | CABiSx0d5d4JJ6CKeo=_3Rf78geR102KJPMLmrRU+UDiHs9pESw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Please stop sending these emails to me
On Fri, Dec 8, 2023, 3:14 PM Rajesh Kumar <rajeshkumar(dot)dba09(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> Hi
>
> We are using openshift environment and postgres version 15.2. We want to
> change storage from ceph to local storage. So, Storage team made default
> storage as local. Now, I created a new cluster with same postgres version
> and I am planning to take backup from old cluster to new cluster. Size is
> 100gb. Ram 24gb, cpu 2.
>
> My question is, is there a combination of pg_dump and pg_restore that
> takes less time to complete the task?
>
> Last time it took more than 8hours. We were taking schema only dump using
> dumpall . Then data only backup using pg_dump in directory format.
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ron Johnson | 2023-12-08 16:16:28 | Re: Related to Foreign Table Accessing |
| Previous Message | Achilleas Mantzios - cloud | 2023-12-08 15:25:12 | Re: application_name backend (not) reporting back to the client : pgbouncer, PgSQL 16.1, pgbouncer 1.21.0 |