Re: Looking for cooperators

From: wd <wd(at)wdicc(dot)com>
To:
Cc: PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Looking for cooperators
Date: 2012-12-12 14:33:44
Message-ID: CABexzmgy9Mt=qE7CDSS8B2jGo2U1Vm6AVRrQ_otqmR3yxvnJzQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Seems they fork from postgres, pgadmin and rename them to highgo and
hgadmin, but didn't announce this anywhere.

(Merlln, sorry for the individual mail)

On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Fan, Yi <fanyify(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > To whom it my concern,
> >
> > We are a Chinese company (www.highgo.com/en/index.html) working on open
> > source DB products for a while. Our product calls “HighGo Database
> System”
> > which is developed base on PostgreSQL.
> >
> > HighGo DB already gained a board market in China. We a looking for some
> > cooperators to increase our product’s technical competitive in market
> place.
> > Any kinds of cooperation are acceptable, whatever you are a company or an
> > individual.
> >
> >
> > If you are interested in Chinese market or want to bring your brilliant
> idea
> > into a real product please feel free to contact me on
> fanyi(at)highgo(dot)com(dot)cn(dot)
>
> Couple points:
> *) It's considered poor taste to cross post to various lists like
> that. Pick one (if in doubt, choose -general).
>
> *) Your web page is in fact located here:
> http://www.highgo.com.cn/en/index.html
>
> Are you running a fork of postgres, or trying to wrap a professional
> services company around it?
>
> merlin
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-12-12 15:29:01 Re: C Function Memory Management
Previous Message Sim Zacks 2012-12-12 13:24:17 Re: NOTIFY/LISTEN on server, asynchronous processing