From: | Martín Marqués <martin(dot)marques(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Adam Cornett <adam(dot)cornett(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 9.1 replication on different arch |
Date: | 2011-11-02 18:21:42 |
Message-ID: | CABeG9LszeUpZXnPwQ_bWKM1K84AHkYOw1xGDeWP8XOmUnKpkEg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Don't worry, they are both x86 arch, so I'll just install 32bit
postgresql on the 64 bit server. That should make it work, right?
El día 2 de noviembre de 2011 14:55, Adam Cornett
<adam(dot)cornett(at)gmail(dot)com> escribió:
>
> 2011/11/2 Martín Marqués <martin(dot)marques(at)gmail(dot)com>
>>
>> I have two servers, one a x86 32bit server, and the other one is a x86
>> 64 bit server.
>>
>> We want to use synchronous replication and make the 32 bit be a master
>> and the 64bit be a read-only stand-by.
>>
>> Do I have to install 32bit postgresql on the 64bit server to be able
>> to use wal replication?
>>
>> --
>> Martín Marqués
>> select 'martin.marques' || '@' || 'gmail.com'
>> DBA, Programador, Administrador
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
>
> Native replication is only available on systems with the same architecture,
> so the short answer is no.
> But I'm pretty sure you can still use other replication tools like Slony or
> Bucardo, although neither is synchronous.
> -Adam
--
Martín Marqués
select 'martin.marques' || '@' || 'gmail.com'
DBA, Programador, Administrador
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John R Pierce | 2011-11-02 18:34:19 | Re: 9.1 replication on different arch |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-11-02 18:21:00 | Re: postgresql-9.1.1 PQescapeByteaConn() generating incorrectly quoted output. |