From: | Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation |
Date: | 2025-02-03 14:33:57 |
Message-ID: | CABdArM4k5PW-P+JbwNtGkczQki45kD5AouomQd9tNXCKB2gkzw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 12:04 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 6:16 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > 2.
> > + appendStringInfo(&err_hint, "You might need to increase \"%s\".",
> > + "max_slot_wal_keep_size");
> > break;
> > 2a.
> > In this case, shouldn't you really be using macro _("You might need to
> > increase \"%s\".") so that the common format string would be got using
> > gettext()?
> >
> > ~
> >
> >
> > ~~~
> >
> > 3.
> > + appendStringInfo(&err_hint, "You might need to increase \"%s\".",
> > + "idle_replication_slot_timeout");
> > + break;
> >
> > 3a.
> > Ditto above. IMO this common format string should be got using macro.
> > e.g.: _("You might need to increase \"%s\".")
> >
> > ~
>
> Instead, we can directly use '_(' in errhint as we are doing in one
> other similar place "errhint("%s", _(view_updatable_error))));". I
> think we didn't use it for errdetail because, in one of the cases, it
> needs to use ngettext
>
Please find the v67 patches:
- The patches have been rebased after separating the inactive_since
related changes.
- Patches 001 and 002 incorporate the above comments and the comments
from [1] and [2].
- No change in patch-003 since the last version.
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALDaNm0FS%2BFqQk2dadiJFCMM_MhKROMsJUb%3Db8wtRH6isScQsQ%40mail.gmail.com
[2] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHut%2BPs_6%2BNBOt%2BKpQQaBG2R3T-FLS93TbUC27uzyDMu%3D37n-Q%40mail.gmail.com
--
Thanks,
Nisha
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v67-0001-Introduce-inactive_timeout-based-replication-slo.patch | application/x-patch | 22.7 KB |
v67-0002-Add-TAP-test-for-slot-invalidation-based-on-inac.patch | application/x-patch | 6.3 KB |
v67-0003-Add-TAP-test-for-slot-invalidation-based-on-inac.patch | application/x-patch | 10.1 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dmitry Koval | 2025-02-03 15:37:47 | Re: Add SPLIT PARTITION/MERGE PARTITIONS commands |
Previous Message | Tender Wang | 2025-02-03 14:28:59 | Re: Unsafe access BufferDescriptors array in BufferGetLSNAtomic() |