From: | Sherrylyn Branchaw <sbranchaw(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Change error code for hstore syntax error |
Date: | 2016-05-12 15:46:01 |
Message-ID: | CAB_myF4DtZdSJTKsq0cUPYv9-Q3geK+nDx7FJ5Y5R+mvkN-1mQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Submitting to the CommitFest is how you make sure that someone looks
at the patch to see if any issues exist. Obviously, if someone
reviews before then, that's great, but you can't count on it.
Understood. It's just that Tom had already replied, so I wanted to give him
first crack at it, if, say, I had grossly misinterpreted his suggestions.
The guide on submitting a patch advises taking silence as consent within
reason. Since there's been enough silence, I was planning on submitting to
the commitfest soon.
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Sherrylyn Branchaw <sbranchaw(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > I'm attaching a revised patch; please let me know if there are any other
> > issues before I submit to the commitfest.
>
> Submitting to the CommitFest is how you make sure that someone looks
> at the patch to see if any issues exist. Obviously, if someone
> reviews before then, that's great, but you can't count on it.
>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-05-12 15:48:26 | Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in parallel worker (ExecInitSubPlan) |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-05-12 15:39:43 | Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in parallel worker (ExecInitSubPlan) |