Re: pg_dump new feature: exporting functions only. Bad or good idea ?

From: Laetitia Avrot <laetitia(dot)avrot(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ryan Lambert <ryan(at)rustprooflabs(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, ahsan hadi <ahsan(dot)hadi(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump new feature: exporting functions only. Bad or good idea ?
Date: 2022-04-08 06:36:13
Message-ID: CAB_COdidZ5PjJ+UNXEXzZsTdxQaZQGQNigY+9A4o_B=wf-V4mw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Le jeu. 7 avr. 2022, 07:43, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> a écrit :

>
> Looks clear to me that a different design is wanted here, and that
> this won't make it for v15, so I have marked the patch as returned
> with feedback in the CF app.
>
> Hello,

I agree with Michael, this won't be ready for PG15. I had planned to work
on this sooner but I life happened...

Have a great day,

Lætitia

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-04-08 07:10:49 Re: Windows now has fdatasync()
Previous Message Peter Smith 2022-04-08 06:12:07 Re: PG DOCS - logical replication filtering