Re: PostgreSQL Studio mailing list

On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 6:31 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> On 5 August 2014 05:04, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> >> if it was jut pgstudio-general, then you could use the list for users as
> >> well.
> >
> > Actually -- the BDR devs requested a mailing list too, and they were
> > told to use pgsql-general for the time being, and that a
> > project-specific mailing list would be created if traffic proves beyond
> > some (unspecified) level. Why not do the same here?
>
> Because there doesn't seem any benefit in doing that.
>
> BDR is a feature aimed at inclusion in core and I understand why
> people say it should therefore be managed by existing lists. The
> situation here seems somewhat different since nobody is suggesting
> this project is in core.
>
> There could one day be a BDR list, so it may yet end up being the same.
>
> I'd vote for a more general list called pgstudio(at)postgresql(dot)org

Is there a verdict on this? A general list called pgstudio(at)postgresql(dot)org
works for me.

>
>
> --
> Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www
>