| From: | Naresh g <naresh5310(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Advice on Best BCP Plan |
| Date: | 2019-07-09 18:30:32 |
| Message-ID: | CABXEXoMOivUYgpoKG2k3qhTgomR5LS8gZYapS2n6CjPpX2vr5w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Dear Team,
We have a production database with two hot standby's at two different
locations.
Let's say A (production) has two standby's (B&C).
Now we are planning to do a BCP activity.
What would be the best plan to do this activity?
As I have two standby's configured, is shutting down one standby site
throughout the activity creates any problem? or any other best way ?
1. A ( Standby) and B(production) and C being in shutdown mode.
2. A (Standby) and B(production) and C(standby for B).
or like any other plan?
Please let me know.
Thank you.
Naresh.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2019-07-09 19:01:20 | Re: REINDEX : new parameter to preserve current average leaf density as new implicit FILLFACTOR |
| Previous Message | John Lumby | 2019-07-09 18:27:47 | Re: REINDEX : new parameter to preserve current average leaf density as new implicit FILLFACTOR |