From: | Віталій Тимчишин <tivv00(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Craig Ringer <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Re: [SQL] JDBC Statement.setQueryTimeout : is there plan to implement this? |
Date: | 2011-12-15 08:11:00 |
Message-ID: | CABWW-d0mOUWM6txn5QnxMk=Sch6v5BDewnAr-VtD_=e4dHMMFw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc pgsql-sql |
2011/12/15 Craig Ringer <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au>
>
> Perhaps more excitingly, a generic ThreadPoolExecutor can be safely used
> within an EE container the same way, potentially allowing the JDBC driver
> to use threads for blocking I/O. That'd finally permit a version of
> PgConnection.getNotifications() that can be safely invoked without blocking
> when SSL is in use!
>
> A driver thread pool could also help permanently fix those occasional
> deadlocks that happen due to buffer management issues in the JDBC driver.
>
> I'll try to find time to do some testing and see if I can make this work
> or at least bash out a proof of concept.
>
> ?
>
How about moving to NIO? Or may be I could try it myself. Can you give me a
class name I need to dig into transport layer?
--
Best regards,
Vitalii Tymchyshyn
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2011-12-15 11:21:11 | Re: Re: [SQL] JDBC Statement.setQueryTimeout : is there plan to implement this? |
Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2011-12-15 04:45:57 | Re: [SQL] JDBC Statement.setQueryTimeout : is there plan to implement this? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2011-12-15 11:21:11 | Re: Re: [SQL] JDBC Statement.setQueryTimeout : is there plan to implement this? |
Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2011-12-15 04:45:57 | Re: [SQL] JDBC Statement.setQueryTimeout : is there plan to implement this? |