| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomonari Katsumata <t(dot)katsumata1122(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: dividing privileges for replication role. |
| Date: | 2013-01-20 12:42:20 |
| Message-ID: | CABUevEztOm4YPDrWiP0K=Hp3-MSo3ty+DoJV5eRobw3-wGC4Vw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 4:47 AM, Tomonari Katsumata
<t(dot)katsumata1122(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I made a patch to divide privileges for replication role.
>
> Currently(9.2), the privilege for replication role is
> true / false which means that standby server is able to
> connect to another server or not with the replication role.
Why is it better to do this with a privilege, rather than just using
pg_hba.conf? It doesn't represent an actual "permission level" after
all - it's just an administrative "flag" to say you can't connect.
Which AFAICS can just as easily be handled in pg_hba.conf? I guess I'm
missing something?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2013-01-20 13:40:52 | Re: [WIP] pg_ping utility |
| Previous Message | Satoshi Nagayasu | 2013-01-20 12:10:25 | Re: New statistics for WAL buffer dirty writes |